LIFE SOURCE SERVICES OF BATON ROUGE

BATON ROUGE, LACCN: 191591
YELLOW

Overall

63.1

Quality

53.3

Compliance

65.0

Operational

70.0

Market

65.0

CAHPS Survey Rating

4.0

Family Caregiver Survey

Contact Information

Address

11605 SOUTHFORK AVENUE, SUITE A

BATON ROUGE, LA 70816

Website

No website on file

Administrator

MICHELE BROWNING, ADMINISTRATOR

Financial & Registry Data

Cost Report (2024)
Revenue$9.7M
Expenses$7.4M
Net Income$2.25M
Cost/Day$255

Provider Details

CountyEast Baton Rouge
Ownership TypeFor-Profit
ADC82
ADC Fitmarginal
Service Area (ZIPs)54
Market TypeUrban
CertifiedSep 27, 2004
County Demographics
65+ Population71,976
% 65+15.8%
Median Income$62,083

Ownership Profile

Complexityunknown
Owner Count
PE/Investment BackedNo
Chain AffiliatedNo
Recent Ownership ChangeNo

Classification Reasons

Positive: Strong operational performance
Concern: Quality needs review (score: 53)

Outreach Status

Readiness

Monitor - Complete diligence first

Deal Type

Possible platform or large tuck-in

Sell-Side Hypothesis

Standard owner exit motivations: retirement, capital needs, or strategic realignment

Rating Sensitivity

Upgrade Triggers

Quality improvement above 70 threshold; Compliance metrics improvement; CON state expansion opportunity

Downgrade Triggers

Compliance score drop below 40; Quality score drop below 30; CMS enforcement action

Owner Carry-Back Analysis

93/100
HIGH
Independent Ownership+30

Not backed by private equity - more likely to consider creative financing

Standalone Operation+20

Not part of larger chain - owner has full decision authority

Single Owner+20

Sole owner can make quick decisions on seller financing

Medium Operation+8

Larger ADC - may attract institutional buyers but still viable

Stable Ownership+10

Long-term owner more likely to have emotional investment and consider flexible terms

For-Profit+5

For-profit structure - owner seeks return, more receptive to deal structures

Prime Owner Carry-Back Candidate

This provider shows strong indicators for owner financing. Single/simple ownership structure, no PE involvement, and ideal operational size suggest the owner may be receptive to a seller note arrangement. Consider approaching with a 10-20% carry-back proposal.

Data Quality & Completeness

Completeness Score

85%

Data Quality

HIGH

Confidence

High (0.88)

Missing Fields

quality_stars
Data Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog Nov 2025, PECOS Q1 2026 • Analysis Date: Jan 26, 2026