ASCEND HOSPICE
Overall
46.5
Quality
20.0
Compliance
57.5
Operational
40.0
Market
65.0
Contact Information
Provider Details
Ownership Profile
Classification Reasons
Outreach Status
Readiness
Not Recommended - Poor fit or high risk
Deal Type
Possible platform or large tuck-in
Sell-Side Hypothesis
Standard owner exit motivations: retirement, capital needs, or strategic realignment
Rating Sensitivity
Upgrade Triggers
Target smaller subsidiary or carve-out opportunity; Quality metrics improvement in next CAHPS cycle
Downgrade Triggers
Already at lowest classification
Owner Carry-Back Analysis
Not backed by private equity - more likely to consider creative financing
Not part of larger chain - owner has full decision authority
Sole owner can make quick decisions on seller financing
Large ADC typically attracts PE/strategic buyers
Long-term owner more likely to have emotional investment and consider flexible terms
For-profit structure - owner seeks return, more receptive to deal structures
Prime Owner Carry-Back Candidate
This provider shows strong indicators for owner financing. Single/simple ownership structure, no PE involvement, and ideal operational size suggest the owner may be receptive to a seller note arrangement. Consider approaching with a 10-20% carry-back proposal.
Data Quality & Completeness
Completeness Score
Data Quality
HIGH
Confidence
High (0.88)
Missing Fields
Similar Providers
Compare →Providers with similar ADC, score, and classification
VALOR HOSPICE
FORT WORTH, TX
47.7
Score
132.00
ADC
Indep
Type
HEARTLAND HOSPICE (BALTIMORE)
WINDSOR MILL, MD
47.0
Score
133.00
ADC
Indep
Type
ACCENTCARE HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF PENNSYLVAN
KING OF PRUSSIA, PA
45.8
Score
133.00
ADC
Indep
Type
ADVANTAGE HEALTH SYSTEMS
SAN DIEGO, CA
44.2
Score
133.00
ADC
Indep
Type
BETTER CARE MATTERS
TEXAS CITY, TX
49.2
Score
133.00
ADC
Indep
Type